Court Enjoins Post-Dispatch; 2d Article on Study Withheld
Date: 27 June 1971
St Louis Post-Dispatch repts it has been enjoined by Fed Ct from further publication of article based on study; 1st article quoted McNamara memo on various aspects of war
Sérgio Cláudio dos Santos, detto Serginho (Nilópolis, 27 giugno 1971), è un ex calciatore brasiliano, di ruolo difensore o centrocampista.
Nelle nove stagioni trascorse al Milan Serginho è stato campione d'Italia nel 2004 e due volte campione d'Europa nel 2003 e nel 2007. Ha inoltre messo in bacheca due Supercoppe Europee, una Coppa del mondo per club, una Coppa Italia ed una Supercoppa italiana
Per saperne di più...Il 27 giugno 1971 era una domenica sotto il segno zodiacale del ♋. Era il 177 ° giorno dell'anno. Il presidente degli Stati Uniti era Richard M. Nixon.
Se sei nato in questo giorno, hai 54 anni. Il tuo ultimo compleanno era il venerdì 27 giugno 2025, 129 giorni fa. Il tuo prossimo compleanno è il sabato 27 giugno 2026, in 235 giorni. Hai vissuto per 19.853 giorni, o circa 476.472 ore, o circa 28.588.375 minuti, o circa 1.715.302.500 secondi.
Date: 27 June 1971
St Louis Post-Dispatch repts it has been enjoined by Fed Ct from further publication of article based on study; 1st article quoted McNamara memo on various aspects of war
Date: 27 June 1971
By FRED P. GRAHAM
Fred GRAHAM
comment on case before US Sup Ct; caricature
Date: 28 June 1971
By JOHN L. HESSSpecial to The New York Times
John HESSSpecial
article on phenomenon of proliferating 'underground press' in W Eur; illus
Date: 27 June 1971
Knight press article repts that study documents show that US mil leaders were putting pressure on Johnson to expand war into Laos, Cambodia and N Vietnam in '66 and '67
Date: 28 June 1971
By ROGER HILSMAN
Roger HILSMAN
R Hilsman lauds Times publication of study documents; says natl security is not endangered; sees bias in study because authors of analyses in study were members of Johnson Adm
Date: 27 June 1971
Special to The New York Times
transcript of oral argument in Times and Washington Post cases before the Sup Ct
Date: 27 June 1971
lrs by G Pressman and others on Pentagon study issue
Date: 27 June 1971
By ROBERT M. SMITHSpecial to The New York Times
Ellsberg lawyers Profs C R Nesson and L B Boudin say Ellsberg will give himself up in Boston to the Fed Govt on the morning of June 28; do not disclose his whereabouts; Boudin gives reasons for Ellsberg not turning himself in during a weekend; says a ruling by Sup Ct favorable to The Times may 'very well dispose of many of the issues presented in our case' since major consideration is whether or not study consists of natl defense documents; lawyers say that even if everything charged against Ellsworth is true, there has been no crime committed
Date: 28 June 1971
By CHRISTOPHER LYDONSpecial to The New York Times
Sup Ct decision awaited; FBI presses its search for Ellsberg; Sen McGovern say study reveals crimes of deception by Govt officials more serious than any violations of security classification involved in its release; Very Rev F B Sayre scores deception and 'abuse of truth' by 'my friends'; Newsweek repts Gallup Poll shows majority of Amer opinion disapproves of Govt effort at suppression; G W Ball says study should be published but cautions against the search for villains or heroes in it, TV int; seems to agree with Ellsberg warning that Nixon Adm now stands at another critical turning point of Vietnam policy; justifies his own pub advocacy of the official view of the war in '66, contrary to his private opposition to expansion of the war he was presenting to Govt's inner councils; says this is 'exactly what any Govt official must necessarily do if there is to be orderly govt'; does not think study presents a security issue; Time magazine repts Rusk warned Pres Kennedy in '61 not to send 8,000 US troops into Vietnam as Taylor was advocating at the time
Date: 27 June 1971
By TOM WICKER
Tom WICKER
T Wicker justifies Times pub of Pentagon documents; says that argument most frequently advanced by those who question Times's decisions to pub documents rests on 2 fallacious assumptions that 'natl interest' and 'natl security' are synonymous and that only most experienced, skilled and informed Govt officials know best; notes that Govt does not necessarily have best information, that it can have preconceived policy convictions despite contrary facts, and that it always has its own pol self-interest to consider